Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Juarez vs John Sperle Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Juarez vs Sperle analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Juarez vs John Sperle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Juarez has won 47.64% of points on his second serve, while Sperle has won 49.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Juarez, in recent form, has won 58.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sperle has won 55.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.33% and 38.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Juarez has saved 44.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sperle has saved 59.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Juarez has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 27/ 15), with Sperle winning 63.64% (W/L 49/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Juarez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 248/ 143), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Sperle has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 88/ 54), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Juarez has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10), where as Sperle has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.75% of matches (W/L 48/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Juarez winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Juarez winning 2 and Sperle winning 1. The last match between Juarez and Sperle was at the M15 Antalya, 12-04-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Facundo Juarez getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Juarez and Sperle have played a deciding set 1 times, with Juarez winning 1 times and Sperle 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Juarez winning 0, and Sperle 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Juarez has played against opponents with an average rank of 282.02 while Sperle has played against players with an average rank of 120.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Juarez has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sperle has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Juarez has converted 52.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sperle has converted 46.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Juarez 1 - 0 Sperle
611
Rank
321
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
774
Rank
774
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
63% (256-152)
Career Total W/L
59% (110-76)
100% (13-0)
YTD W/L
68% (21-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Facundo Juarez | John Sperle |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (43/64) | 54% (37/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (26/43) | 51% (19/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (7/21) | 38% (12/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 100% (5/5) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (38/69) | 48% (31/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Facundo Juarez
Player
John Sperle
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Juarez | John Sperle |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 100% (13/0) | 68% (21/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 90% (26/3) | 65% (45/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 62% (173/108) | 56% (366/289) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (13/0) | 73% (16/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 62 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:4 | 1:35:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 204.69 | 30.32 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (540/815) | 61% (1120/1841) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (357/540) | 66% (738/1120) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (131/275) | 49% (351/721) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (65/123) | 48% (107/225) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (406/835) | 46% (816/1790) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (13/0) | 68% (21/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (13/13) | 68% (21/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (2/2) | 11% (9/1) |
Facundo Juarez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Filippo Speziali
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Sergio Badini
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Philip Henning
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Andrea Picchione
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Max Schoenhaus
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Alexandru Cristian Dumitru
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Oleg Prihodko
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
0
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Markus Molder
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
John Sperle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Edoardo Zanada
59%
(
69 of
116)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
48 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
109
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
John Sperle
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Andrin Casanova
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Saba Purtseladze
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
John Sperle
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Louroi Martinez
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Juarez Vs Sperle Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Facundo Juarez
Potential H2H Matches This Week For John Sperle
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
